verizon tries defend collecting browsing network
In today’s digital age, our online activities are constantly being monitored and tracked. From the websites we visit to the products we search for, every click and scroll is being recorded by internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon. While this may not come as a surprise to many, a recent revelation by Verizon has sparked outrage among privacy advocates and internet users alike. The company has been collecting and selling its customers’ browsing data to third-party advertisers, raising concerns about the protection of personal information and the invasion of privacy. In response to the backlash, Verizon has attempted to defend its actions, but the question remains – is it ethical for a telecommunications giant to profit from its customers’ online activities?
Verizon’s data collection practices came to light when a journalist, Kashmir Hill, revealed that the company was selling its customers’ browsing data through a program called “Verizon Selects”. This program tracks users’ online activities, such as the websites they visit, the apps they use, and even their location information, in order to create targeted advertisements. Verizon claims that this program is completely opt-in and that customers can choose to participate or opt-out at any time. However, many customers were unaware of this program’s existence and were shocked to find out that their personal information was being sold without their knowledge or consent.
The company’s defense of this practice is that it is a common industry practice and that they are not alone in selling customer data to advertisers. While this may be true, it does not address the fact that customers were not informed about this program and were not given a choice in the matter. In fact, Verizon’s privacy policy does not explicitly mention the sale of browsing data to third parties, which has raised concerns about transparency and accountability. Customers have a right to know how their personal information is being used and shared, and Verizon’s lack of transparency in this matter is a cause for concern.
Another argument put forth by Verizon is that the data collected is non-personal and that it is anonymized before being sold to advertisers. However, as we have seen in the past, anonymized data can easily be re-identified and linked back to specific individuals, especially when combined with other data sets. This puts customers at risk of being targeted by advertisers and their personal information being exposed to potential hackers. Furthermore, it is not just the browsing data that is being collected and sold by Verizon. The company also collects data on customers’ call logs, text messages, and even app usage, all of which can be used to create a detailed profile of an individual’s online behavior.
Verizon has also argued that the sale of browsing data is necessary in order to provide customers with relevant and personalized advertisements. However, this argument falls flat when we consider that customers are already bombarded with targeted ads on a daily basis. It is not just the intrusion of privacy that is concerning, but also the fact that customers are being bombarded with ads that are based on their personal information. This raises questions about the level of control that customers have over their own online experiences and the potential for manipulation by advertisers.
Furthermore, Verizon’s defense of this practice by claiming that customers can opt-out at any time is also problematic. Opting out of the program does not mean that Verizon will stop collecting data on its customers. It simply means that the data collected will not be used for targeted advertising. The data will still be collected and can be sold to other third parties for other purposes, without the knowledge or consent of the customer. This further highlights the lack of control that customers have over their personal information and how it is being used.
Privacy advocates have also raised concerns about the potential for discrimination and bias in the targeted ads created from this data. The data collected by Verizon could potentially be used to discriminate against certain groups of people, whether it be based on race, gender, or socio-economic status. This could lead to further inequality and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. It is not just about protecting our personal information, but also about ensuring that our online experiences are fair and unbiased.
In response to the backlash, Verizon has made some changes to its data collection practices. The company has announced that it will be rolling out a new “opt-in” program, where customers will have to explicitly give their consent for their data to be collected and sold. However, this change will only apply to new customers and existing customers will still have to opt-out if they do not want their data to be collected. This is a step in the right direction, but it still does not address the issue of transparency and the lack of control that customers have over their personal information.
Verizon’s attempt to defend its data collection practices only serves to highlight the need for stronger privacy laws and regulations. In the United States, there is currently no federal law that regulates the collection and use of personal data by ISPs. This lack of regulation has allowed companies like Verizon to profit from their customers’ personal information without any repercussions. It is time for the government to step in and protect the privacy of its citizens.
In conclusion, Verizon’s defense of its data collection practices is not convincing. The company’s attempt to justify its actions by claiming it is a common industry practice and necessary for personalized advertising falls short when we consider the lack of transparency and control that customers have over their personal information. The sale of browsing data without customers’ knowledge or consent is a violation of privacy and raises concerns about discrimination and bias. It is time for Verizon and other ISPs to prioritize the protection of their customers’ personal information and for the government to implement stronger privacy laws to regulate the collection and use of personal data.
youtube date filter not working
YouTube, the popular video-sharing platform, has become an integral part of our daily lives. From entertainment to education, YouTube has something for everyone. With over 2 billion monthly active users, it is the second most visited website in the world, just behind Google. However, like any other platform, YouTube also has its share of flaws. One of the major issues faced by users is the date filter not working correctly. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this problem and possible solutions.
Firstly, let us understand what the date filter on YouTube does. The date filter allows users to sort videos based on the date they were uploaded. This feature is particularly useful when searching for recent or trending videos. It also helps in finding older videos that may have been uploaded by a specific channel. However, many users have reported that the date filter is not working as expected.
One of the main reasons for the YouTube date filter not working could be due to changes in the algorithm. YouTube regularly updates its algorithm to improve user experience and ensure that the most relevant content is displayed. These updates may sometimes affect the functioning of the date filter. For instance, in 2019, YouTube introduced a feature called “Shorts,” which are short-form vertical videos. This update may have caused the date filter to malfunction as it was not programmed to filter these types of videos.
Another reason for the date filter not working could be due to technical glitches or bugs. YouTube is a complex platform, and with millions of videos being uploaded every day, it is not uncommon for technical issues to arise. These glitches may cause the date filter to show incorrect results or not work at all. In such cases, the best course of action would be to report the issue to YouTube support or wait for the developers to fix it.
Apart from technical issues, the date filter may not work correctly due to the type of device being used. YouTube is accessible on various devices, including desktops, laptops, tablets, and smartphones. Each device may have a different set of specifications, and this can affect the functioning of the date filter. For instance, older devices may not support the latest updates, causing the date filter to malfunction.
Furthermore, the date filter may not work as expected due to user error. Sometimes, users may not be using the filter correctly, leading to incorrect results. For example, if a user does not specify a specific date range, the filter may show videos from all time periods, making it seem like it is not working. It is essential to understand how the date filter works and use it correctly to get the desired results.
Another factor that may affect the date filter’s functioning is the type of content being searched for. YouTube has a vast collection of videos, including music, gaming, vlogs, tutorials, and more. Each type of content may have a different upload frequency, and this can affect the date filter’s results. For instance, music videos may have a higher frequency of uploads compared to educational videos. Therefore, the date filter may not show recent results for educational videos as it does for music videos.
Moreover, the date filter may not work correctly due to regional differences. YouTube is available in over 100 countries and supports over 80 languages. Different regions may have a different upload frequency, which can affect the functioning of the date filter. For instance, a video uploaded in a different time zone may not show up in the search results when using the date filter. In such cases, it is best to check the time zones and adjust the filter accordingly.
In addition to the above factors, the date filter may not work correctly due to changes in the video’s metadata. Metadata is information about a video, such as the title, description, tags, and upload date. If the video’s metadata is not updated correctly, it can affect the date filter’s results. For example, a video with an incorrect upload date may not show up in the search results when using the date filter.
Furthermore, the date filter may not work correctly due to the content’s age-restricted status. YouTube has strict community guidelines, and certain videos may be age-restricted, meaning they can only be viewed by users above a certain age. These videos may not show up in the search results when using the date filter, as they are not visible to all users. In such cases, it is best to check the video’s age restriction status and adjust the filter accordingly.
Lastly, the date filter may not work correctly due to changes in YouTube’s policies. YouTube regularly updates its policies to ensure the platform’s safety and prevent the spread of harmful or inappropriate content. These policy changes may affect the date filter’s functioning. For instance, in 2019, YouTube changed its policy on “borderline content,” which is content that comes close to violating community guidelines. This update may have caused some videos to be removed or hidden, affecting the date filter’s results.
In conclusion, the date filter not working correctly on YouTube could be due to various factors, including changes in the algorithm, technical glitches, user error, type of device, content being searched for, regional differences, changes in metadata, age-restricted content, and changes in policies. If you encounter this issue, it is best to first check for any technical issues or user errors. If the problem persists, it is best to report it to YouTube support for further assistance. YouTube is continuously working to improve user experience, and we can expect the date filter to function correctly in the future.
porn accounts on facebook
facebook -parental-controls-guide”>Facebook is one of the largest social media platforms in the world, with over 2.7 billion active users as of 2021. It is a place where people connect with friends, family, and even strangers from all over the globe. However, as with any online platform, Facebook is not immune to the dark side of the internet. One of the most concerning issues on Facebook is the presence of porn accounts.
Porn accounts on Facebook refer to accounts that share or promote pornographic content. These accounts can range from individual profiles to pages and groups, all with the intention of sharing explicit material. While Facebook has strict community standards that prohibit the sharing of pornographic content, these accounts still manage to exist and thrive on the platform. In this article, we will dive deeper into the world of porn accounts on Facebook, the reasons for their existence, and the efforts being made to combat them.
The rise of social media has made it easier for people to access all kinds of content, including pornography. While there are dedicated platforms for adult content, such as Pornhub and OnlyFans, some individuals and organizations have taken to Facebook to promote their explicit material. These porn accounts often operate under the guise of legitimate profiles, making it difficult for Facebook to detect and remove them.
One of the main reasons for the presence of porn accounts on Facebook is the platform’s popularity. With billions of users, Facebook offers a massive audience for pornographic content. These accounts often use clickbait tactics to attract users, such as promising free access to explicit material or using provocative images as profile pictures. As a result, unsuspecting users may stumble upon these accounts and engage with their content, leading to a wider reach for the account.
Moreover, the anonymous nature of the internet allows these porn accounts to operate without fear of repercussions. Many of these accounts are run by individuals or organizations that remain anonymous, making it difficult for Facebook to hold them accountable for their actions. They often use fake names and profiles to avoid detection, and even if their accounts get taken down, they can easily create new ones.
The presence of porn accounts on Facebook is not only problematic for the platform but also for its users. The sharing of explicit content can expose users, especially minors, to harmful and inappropriate material. Facebook has a minimum age requirement of 13 years old, but with the rise of fake accounts, it is challenging to verify the age of users. This puts young users at risk of being exposed to pornographic material, which can have a significant impact on their mental and emotional well-being.
Furthermore, porn accounts can also lead to online harassment and cyberbullying. These accounts often target individuals, especially women, by sharing their intimate photos without their consent. This can result in severe consequences, such as damage to one’s reputation and mental health. Facebook has strict policies against harassment and bullying, but it can be challenging to monitor every account and prevent such incidents from happening.
To combat the presence of porn accounts on Facebook, the platform has taken several measures. It has implemented artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to detect and remove accounts that violate its community standards. Additionally, Facebook relies on user reports to flag and take down inappropriate content and accounts. It also has a team of moderators who review reported content and take appropriate action.
In 2018, Facebook announced that it had removed over 2.2 billion fake accounts in the first quarter of the year. This included accounts that were involved in the sharing of pornographic content. However, despite these efforts, porn accounts continue to emerge on the platform. Some users have even reported that their reports of inappropriate content and accounts have been ignored by Facebook, indicating gaps in the platform’s moderation system.
Moreover, Facebook has also faced criticism for its inconsistency in enforcing its community standards. While it may take down some porn accounts, others continue to operate freely without any consequences. This has led to accusations of biased moderation and favoritism towards certain accounts, further highlighting the need for more effective measures to combat porn accounts on the platform.
In addition to Facebook’s efforts, some non-governmental organizations and internet safety advocates have also taken steps to address the issue of porn accounts on the platform. For instance, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) launched a campaign called #FamiliesAgainstPornography, urging Facebook to do more to prevent the spread of explicit material on its platform. The organization also created a resource center for parents to educate themselves and their children on how to stay safe on social media.
In conclusion, the presence of porn accounts on Facebook is a concerning issue that poses a threat to the safety and well-being of its users. These accounts not only violate the platform’s community standards but also put its users at risk of exposure to inappropriate and harmful content. While Facebook has taken steps to address this issue, more needs to be done to ensure the platform remains a safe space for all its users. It is crucial for Facebook to continuously improve its moderation system and work closely with organizations and advocates to combat the presence of porn accounts on its platform.
